In the first article in this series a couple of weeks ago, I suggested that the trend towards sustainability in the construction sector was being driven by demand as the business case for green buildings becomes more widely appreciated by investors and tenants.
This week, my aim is to survey the most widely used tools for determining a building’s sustainability in different regions and assess the extent to which there is an international harmonization of these green ratings tools. After all, there are over 600 such systems operating in the world today.
Energy savings inherent in efficient design are the basis of the business case for green buildings. The perceived level of a building’s sustainability impacts positively on its valuation because stakeholders recognize this economic value. Indeed, in recent years in the US, LEED has been certifying more existing than new buildings, suggesting that there is a growing demand for environmental efficiency to be recognized. But a building’s level of sustainability is a difficult thing to know and is contingent upon numerous factors – especially location and building purpose. Unfortunately it is not simply a matter of a building having a chic glass façade, timber shades and plants cascading over the roof.
Obviously climatic variations mean that different factors will be important in different regions. For example, on the driest (inhabited) continent, Australia, water efficiency is a much more important consideration than in, say, soggy Norway. Accordingly, countries have developed unique systems to assess the sustainability of buildings in an attempt to enhance their stock of green buildings. But different ratings systems use different parameters, and extrapolate from different building codes, making qualitative comparisons between systems difficult for investors and other stakeholders alike.
Last week we looked at the way that life cycle assessment (LCA) was used in environmental product declarations for construction materials. Currently, LCA methods for building level environmental assessments are in included in BEES and Athena in the US and Umberto, EcoScan, SIMAPRO and GaBi in Europe. Yet the most well recognized systems for assessing the sustainability of buildings are Total Quality Assessment Systems. They compare actual performance against benchmarks across multiple criteria and attempt to comprehend the buildings’ environmental, social and economic implications. The oldest such system, the UK based Building Research Establishment’s BREEAM, was launched in 1990 and now has over 250,000 buildings certified worldwide. It jockeys for market share with the most widely diffused scheme, the US Green Business Council’s LEED, and a raft of others such as Green Star (Australia) and SB Tool (Canada/international) and Three Star (China).
And while these business models do compete, it is worth bearing in mind what they measure. Being voluntary standards their adoption by developers and landlords is generally motivated by the desire to signal information to the outside world as well as by the benefits inherent in a green building. Yet one study analyzing LEED from a LCA perspective found it to be an unreliable gauge of sustainability and others complain that its criteria encourage designers to score points rather than concentrate on designing appropriately for location and purpose – a phenomenon dubbed “LEED brain”. So from a stakeholder’s perspective, the status of the system doing the certifying is perhaps as important as the efficiencies that certification implies. We might, therefore expect ratings systems to compete for visibility in the market rather than necessarily develop the most comprehensive sustainability metric. Herein lays the central conundrum of market based approaches to issues of sustainability.
For example, Green Globes, an online self-assessment tool available in North America operated by the Green Building Initiative (GBI) has recently taken a considerable share of LEED’s market due to the perception that it is a less onerous metric. But questions are being asked about the less stringent stance that Green Globes takes towards timber and chemical products embedded in buildings given GBI’s timber and chemical industry backers who have successfully lobbied for Green Globes to be able to certify US government projects.
But notwithstanding issues of greenwash, I wanted to focus on the international context of ratings systems. The most prominent systems for assessing the sustainability of buildings are associated with the large, commercial World Green Building Council (WGBC). These include BREEAM, LEED (and its local progeny), the Spanish system VERDE and the German DGNB. Another international consortium, the International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment (iiSBE) is more focused on R&D and has developed a generic framework that can be applied to local conditions to develop appropriate indigenous tools.
Studies have suggested that there has been a considerable fragmentation of sustainability ratings systems as they have diffused globally[1]. Although they have basically evolved out of BREEAM, there is no agreed upon criteria or methodology to assess the greenness of buildings. This makes comparability difficult and tends to diminish the transparancy in the real estate sector. An example of where the fragmentation in these systems might cause confusion is in the highest ratings that these systems award. BREEAM uses “excellent”, LEED “platinum” and Green Star “6”. But how can this information be meaningfully digested given that the awarding of a maximum rating does not imply that the same level of sustainability has been reached?
Recognizing this limitation BREEAM, LEED and Green Star are attempting to develop common metrics to help international stakeholders compare buildings between regions and across ratings systems. But it is uncertain whether this is motivated by a desire for transparency or the commercial imperative of keeping upstarts such as Green Globes at bay.
[1] See for example the follow articles, from where much of the material presented herein is drawn; Reed et al, “International comparison of sustainable rating tools”, Journal of sustainable Real Estate, 1:1, (2009); Beradi, “Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector”, Sustainable Development, 20, (2012).
Articel image by Dave Lisle: Shanghai’s Pudong skyline. The building on the right sprouting three cranes is the LEED Gold Star rated Shanghai Tower – now the second tallest building on Earth.
- Products & Solutions (99)
- Trends & Technology (99)
- News & Updates (68)
- Challenges (67)
- Sustainability (48)
- life cycle assessment (44)
- Compliance (29)
- Energy efficiency (29)
- carbon footprint (23)
- circular economy (23)
- echa (21)
- Resource efficiency (19)
- SCIP (19)
- LCA (18)
- material efficiency (18)
- Umberto (17)
- Climate Change (16)
- Material flow cost accounting (15)
- material flow analysis (12)
- Renewable energy (11)
- Process Optimization (10)
- environmental product declaration (9)
- Ecodesign (8)
- Efficiency (8)
- Transparency (8)
- Trends (8)
- life cycle inventory (8)
- Customer driven-sustainability (7)
- Eco label (7)
- Ecological footprint (7)
- Ipoint suite (7)
- Lca databases (7)
- Supply chain (7)
- Survey (7)
- Sustainable development (7)
- automotive (7)
- blockchain (7)
- Reach (6)
- Renewable heat (6)
- research (6)
- China (5)
- Corporate carbon footprint (5)
- Digitalization (5)
- Industrial ecology (5)
- Materialflusskostenrechnung (5)
- carbon footprinting (5)
- carbon neutrality (5)
- digital product passport (5)
- waste management (5)
- Climate protection (4)
- Cobalt reporting (4)
- Dematerialization (4)
- EPD (4)
- GHG reduction (4)
- Green construction (4)
- OECD (4)
- Okobilanzierung (4)
- Social metabolism (4)
- Sustainable transport (4)
- carbon neutral (4)
- construction industry (4)
- germany (4)
- Big Data (3)
- Brexit (3)
- Chemical industry (3)
- Conflict minerals (3)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (3)
- Database (3)
- Due diligence (3)
- E-mobility (3)
- Environmental product declarations (3)
- Eutrophication (3)
- IFEU (3)
- ISO 50001 (3)
- Industrial sector (3)
- Innovation (3)
- Leed (3)
- Life cycle management (3)
- Medical device (3)
- Photovoltaics (3)
- Ressourceneffizienz (3)
- Social media (3)
- building sector (3)
- greenhouse gas inventory (3)
- svhc (3)
- transport sector (3)
- water footprint (3)
- 20-20-20 Objectives (2)
- 3D printing (2)
- BASF (2)
- Christian-Doppler-Laboratory (2)
- Competence center (2)
- Conflict minerals reporting (2)
- Cycling (2)
- E-car (2)
- Electric car (2)
- Emerging economies (2)
- Environmental impact (2)
- Environmental management (2)
- Environmental performance (2)
- Environmental sustainability index (2)
- European commission (2)
- Fish (2)
- Gate to gate (2)
- Global warming (2)
- Governance (2)
- Green business 2 (2)
- Green investment (2)
- Human rights (2)
- ISO-14051 (2)
- Inatba (2)
- Integrated reporting (2)
- Integrative approach (2)
- Knowledge economy (2)
- LCA data from suppliers (2)
- Life cycle thinking (2)
- MFA (2)
- Manufacturing industry (2)
- Okobilanz (2)
- Renewable Resources (2)
- Sdgs (2)
- Software (2)
- Steady state economy (2)
- Sustainable business (2)
- Sustainable lifestyle (2)
- UK REACH (2)
- Umberto for carbon footprint (2)
- Umweltbundesamt (2)
- Wastewater treatment (2)
- Water management (2)
- agriculture (2)
- best practice (2)
- biodiversity (2)
- biomass (2)
- building standards (2)
- carbon emissions (2)
- carbon intensity (2)
- carbon relocation (2)
- collaborative consumption (2)
- consistency (2)
- corporate material flow modeling (2)
- cost savings (2)
- developing world (2)
- eLCAr (2)
- energiewende (2)
- energy (2)
- esankey (2)
- food industry (2)
- green jobs (2)
- holistic approach (2)
- milk (2)
- modern slavery (2)
- okobilanzdaten (2)
- productivity (2)
- resilience (2)
- sankey diagram (2)
- seafood (2)
- transport (2)
- 2012 (1)
- 3 scopes (1)
- ACHEMA (1)
- AI (1)
- Abfallwirtschaft (1)
- Ankara (1)
- B2B (1)
- BMBF (1)
- BREEAM (1)
- Bachelor program (1)
- Bauwesen (1)
- Brazil (1)
- CFC (1)
- CO2-Fußabdruck (1)
- Carbon Accounting (1)
- Central america (1)
- Circular Economy Action Plan (1)
- Club of Rome (1)
- Co2 Pricing (1)
- Commercial Sector (1)
- Comparative life cycle assessment (1)
- Compliance agent (1)
- Composite indicator (1)
- Construction (1)
- Consumer goods (1)
- Consumption (1)
- Country Attractiveness (1)
- Creative sustainability (1)
- Critique of the green economy (1)
- Csr report (1)
- Dairy (1)
- Dashboard of sustainability (1)
- Data (1)
- Data collection (1)
- Davos (1)
- Decarbonization (1)
- Denmark (1)
- Design (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Developing countries (1)
- Dienstleistungen (1)
- Digital twin (1)
- Distributed manufacturing (1)
- Divestment (1)
- Domestic fuel consumption (1)
- Domestic sector (1)
- Duty of care (1)
- Earth Sciences (1)
- Earth summit (1)
- Ecolabelling (1)
- Ecologic footprint (1)
- Ecological resilience (1)
- Education (1)
- Efficiency measures (1)
- Effizienzfabrik (1)
- Ehs (1)
- Emission relocation (1)
- Ems (1)
- Energieeffizienz (1)
- Energy Intensity by Sector (1)
- Energy contracting (1)
- Energy efficiency directive (1)
- Energy transition (1)
- Engineering excellence (1)
- Enhipro (1)
- Environment (1)
- Environmental Contracting (1)
- Environmental Engineering (1)
- Environmental balance (1)
- Environmental capital (1)
- Environmental labeling (1)
- Environmental management accounting (1)
- Environmental profit and loss statement (1)
- Environmental standard (1)
- Environmentally Weighed Material Consumption (1)
- European Comission (1)
- European Green Cars Initiative (1)
- Evaleau (1)
- Events (1)
- External effects (1)
- Fifa (1)
- Fishery (1)
- Fmd (1)
- Food footprint (1)
- Food production (1)
- Ford (1)
- Forest ecosystems (1)
- France (1)
- Free trade (1)
- Freighter travel (1)
- Full cost accounting (1)
- GHG mitigation (1)
- Ghg reduction goals (1)
- Global compact (1)
- Global justice (1)
- Global warming potential (1)
- Green building (1)
- Green business models (1)
- Green consumers (1)
- Green deal (1)
- Green new deal (1)
- Greenwash (1)
- HVAC (1)
- Happy life years (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Harze (1)
- Hdpe (1)
- Human development index (1)
- Human trafficking (1)
- ILCD Handbook (1)
- IPCA (1)
- IPCC (1)
- ISO 14015 (1)
- ISO 14031 (1)
- ISO 14064 (1)
- ISO 14067 (1)
- ISO-14000 (1)
- ISO-14008 (1)
- ISO-14025 (1)
- ISO-14046 (1)
- Impact category (1)
- Incentive (1)
- Incentive based pay (1)
- Incineration (1)
- India (1)
- Industry-4-0 (1)
- Information design (1)
- Input output (1)
- Input output databases (1)
- Input output economics (1)
- Inreff (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Internalization of externalities (1)
- International standards (1)
- Interplant collaboration (1)
- Iso 14001 (1)
- Jevons paradox (1)
- Klimawandel (1)
- Konsumguter (1)
- Kuznets curve (1)
- LIFE AskREACH (1)
- Lieferkettengesetz (1)
- Life cycle analysis (1)
- Life cycle perspective (1)
- Life style (1)
- Linkedin (1)
- Living planet report (1)
- Long-Term Pay (1)
- Material consumption (1)
- Material flow modeling (1)
- Material flowcosts (1)
- Material footprint (1)
- Medical device regulation (1)
- Metal industry (1)
- Mexico (1)
- Monetize external costs (1)
- Montreal Protocol (1)
- Municipal solid waste (1)
- Natural Cost Accounting (1)
- Nature conservation (1)
- Nitrate pollution (1)
- Nutrients balance (1)
- Nutrients cycle (1)
- OECD Environment Policy Committee (1)
- Okobilanzdatenbanken (1)
- Okolabelling (1)
- Okologischer fusabdruck (1)
- Online Resource Efficiency Platform OREP (1)
- Operational efficiency (1)
- Outsourcing (1)
- PET (1)
- Pas (1)
- Pcf (1)
- Philippines (1)
- Pilot program (1)
- Plastic industry (1)
- Polio (1)
- Pollution haven hypothesis (1)
- Process engineering (1)
- Process improvement (1)
- Process system engineering (1)
- Product management (1)
- Product stewardship (1)
- Product sustainability (1)
- Production based CO2 Productivity (1)
- Production planning (1)
- Produktlebensdauer (1)
- Prop 65 (1)
- Protection proprietary data (1)
- Qatar (1)
- Quality (1)
- Quality journalism (1)
- Rapid prototyping (1)
- Refuse derived fuel plant (1)
- Renewable energy in manufacturing (1)
- Renewable methane (1)
- Renewable process heat (1)
- Renewable raw material (1)
- Resource flows (1)
- Retailer (1)
- Rio20 summit (1)
- Rolf Dobelli (1)
- Sap (1)
- Sfdr (1)
- Shopping rage (1)
- Smart grid (1)
- Social ecological resilience (1)
- Solar thermal energy (1)
- Sorgfaltspflichtengesetz (1)
- South africa (1)
- Soy milk (1)
- Stakeholder management (1)
- Supermarket chain (1)
- Sustainability indicators (1)
- Sustainability performance (1)
- Sustainability strategy (1)
- Sustainable architecture (1)
- Sustainable construction (1)
- Sustainable living (1)
- Sustainable process index (1)
- Sustainable resins (1)
- Sustainable resource management (1)
- Sydney (1)
- System analysis (1)
- Telecommunications (1)
- Tobias viere (1)
- Total material consumption (1)
- Treibhauspotenzial (1)
- Turkey (1)
- UK CA (1)
- University (1)
- Upcycling (1)
- VDMA (1)
- Vertical cooperation (1)
- Waste prevention (1)
- Water abstraction rate (1)
- Water extraction (1)
- Wind power (1)
- World cup (1)
- World vegan day (1)
- Yet (1)
- Zero carbon city (1)
- Zero emission mobility (1)
- academia (1)
- acidification (1)
- air quality (1)
- aluminum (1)
- amazon (1)
- antarctic ozone hole (1)
- apocalypse (1)
- apple (1)
- assessment (1)
- atmospheric carbon measurement (1)
- background database (1)
- battery change station (1)
- bike sharing (1)
- bio capacity (1)
- bio-economy (1)
- biocapacity (1)
- biological gas treatment (1)
- blogs (1)
- books (1)
- business opportunity (1)
- car (1)
- carbon free city (1)
- carbon leakage (1)
- carbon management (1)
- carbon management 2 (1)
- carbon reduction (1)
- carbon tax (1)
- carbon-neutral travel (1)
- cargo shipping (1)
- carton (1)
- certification (1)
- change (1)
- climate impact (1)
- climate neutral (1)
- co2 fusabdruck (1)
- cogeneration (1)
- combined reporting (1)
- commons (1)
- cooperation along product (1)
- cradle to cradle (1)
- de-growth economy (1)
- digital battery passport (1)
- ecarus (1)
- eco design (1)
- ecoinvent (1)
- ecological tax reform (1)
- ecosystem disturbance (1)
- efficiency investment (1)
- efficient construction (1)
- energy efficiency in production (1)
- energy sources (1)
- environmental accounting (1)
- environmental impact data (1)
- environmental management system (1)
- environmental performance indicator (1)
- environmental technology verification (1)
- environmentally friendly raw materials (1)
- esg (1)
- fashion (1)
- food loss (1)
- food sector (1)
- geopolymer cement (1)
- green Christmas (1)
- green buildings (1)
- green paradox (1)
- green production (1)
- greenhouse (1)
- handprinting (1)
- holistic sustainability (1)
- lca recommendations (1)
- lca-software (1)
- lcia (1)
- lifecycle (1)
- logitech (1)
- management models (1)
- material flow balance (1)
- material losses (1)
- material-flow-accounts (1)
- media (1)
- modeling (1)
- nuclear phase out (1)
- policy instruments (1)
- politics (1)
- post oil age (1)
- product environmental footprint (1)
- production circle (1)
- ressource efficiency analysis (1)
- saving potentials (1)
- scope 3 (1)
- season's greetings (1)
- smart meter (1)
- social cost accounting (1)
- stranded assets (1)
- sustainability control (1)
- sustainability projects (1)
- sustainable products (1)
- tajikistan (1)
- textile industry (1)
- textile refinement (1)
- toyota (1)
- trade (1)
- transport emissions (1)
- uk-rohs (1)
- umweltbilanz (1)
- urban carbon emissions (1)
- velib (1)
- volvo (1)
- waste air treatment (1)
- waste hierarchy (1)
- wastewater (1)
- water stress (1)
- wind gas (1)
- world statistics day (1)
- zero growth (1)
- Ökologischer Fußabdruck (1)