According to a report by the European Environment Agency, transport was responsible for around a quarter of the EU's total CO₂ emissions in 2022. Road transport accounted for 71.7 per cent of this. Even if the largest share is caused by the use of vehicles, it is also worthwhile for car manufacturers to take a look at the manufacturing process. OEMs of the time have recognized this and are driving carbon reduction into their supply chain. But how exactly can the carbon footprint of car manufacturing be reduced?
When it comes to conducting a carbon footprint in the automotive industry, the perspectives, scopes and system boundaries vary significantly between OEMs and suppliers. This discrepancy stems from the different roles and responsibilities each entity holds within the supply chain, as well as their objectives and priorities in sustainability efforts.
Supplier Perspective: Cradle to Gate Approach
Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers typically adopt a cradle-to-gate approach, which assesses the environmental impacts of their manufacturing processes, including sourcing of raw materials up to the point of product delivery to the OEM. Suppliers are often driven by OEM requirements and contracts, which may specify the need for carbon footprint assessments up to the gate.
OEM Perspective: Cradle to Grave Approach
OEMs typically should adopt a cradle-to-grave approach when assessing the CO2 footprint of their vehicles. This approach considers the entire life cycle of the product, from raw material extraction and manufacturing to use and end-of-life phases. However, they often face challenges in considering the use phase and end-of-life aspects due to limited data availability and comparability issues.
Collaboration Opportunities
While OEMs and suppliers operate with different scopes, there is an opportunity for alignment and collaboration, to ensure transparency and consistency across the supply chain. By understanding each other's perspectives and priorities, automakers and suppliers can identify opportunities for CO2 emissions reduction and resource efficiency throughout the supply chain.
Establishing industry standards and best practices for carbon footprinting can facilitate consistent methodologies and data sharing among OEMs and suppliers. This fosters transparency, trust, and collective action towards achieving sustainability goals across the automotive sector.
Comparing the environmental impact of Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) and Internal Combustion Engine vehicles (ICEVs) poses challenges due to differences in materials, production processes, and usage patterns. However, studies indicate that BEVs offer significant environmental benefits over ICEVs, particularly in terms of GHG reduction.
While the raw material and production phases of BEVs have higher carbon footprints, the use phase significantly reduces emissions, especially with renewable energy sources. Over the vehicle's lifetime, the lower emissions from BEVs offset the initial carbon footprint associated with battery production, leading to a lower carbon footprint of electric cars overall. Studies show that for mid-sized vehicles the break-even point occurs at a mileage of 60 – 80,000 km, i.e. within a car’s typical lifespan.
Ensuring proper end-of-life handling of batteries is crucial to maximize the environmental benefits of BEVs. Recycling and repurposing battery materials can minimize waste and reduce the environmental footprint of disposal. Implementing effective battery recycling programs and developing secondary use applications for retired batteries can extend their lifespan and contribute to a more sustainable battery supply chain.
When considering the climate impact of a car, it's natural for most people to focus on factors related to vehicle usage, such as fuel consumption and tailpipe emissions. Indeed, studies often highlight the significant contribution of vehicle operation to overall carbon emissions. However, to truly understand the environmental impact of cars, the entire life cycle of a vehicle, including raw materials and manufacturing, must be considered.
Steel is a fundamental material in automotive manufacturing, renowned for its strength, durability, and versatility. However, its production and usage contribute significantly to carbon emissions throughout the vehicle lifecycle.
The production of steel involves energy-intensive processes, particularly in the raw material phase. The smelting or melting of iron ore to produce steel requires substantial amounts of energy, primarily sourced from fossil fuels. In addition, the manufacturing processes of pressing, stamping and moulding steel components also require a considerable amount of energy. Moreover, the high density and weight of steel increase transport emissions during the transport and assembly phases.
Various approaches are available to mitigate the climate impact of steel: the increased use of recycled steel to minimise energy-intensive raw material production, the use of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind energy for steel production and the transition to hydrogen-based steel production methods.
Aluminum is widely utilized in the automotive industry due to its lightweight properties, which contribute to improved fuel efficiency and reduced emissions during vehicle operation. However, the production of aluminum is energy-intensive, posing challenges in terms of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG).
Emphasizing aluminum recycling and closed-loop systems is a key strategy to reduce the carbon footprint of aluminum. Recycling aluminum requires significantly less energy compared to primary production, resulting in lower emissions.
The introduction of advanced technologies, such as prebake and inert anode smelting processes, can improve energy efficiency and reduce the global warming potential of aluminum production. In addition, the integration of renewable energy sources such as hydropower or solar energy into the smelting process further mitigates the environmental impact.
Despite metals, plastics plays also a vital role in car manufacturing, offering versatility, durability, and design flexibility. However, the production and usage of plastics contribute to GHG emissions, primarily driven by energy-intensive processes such as polymer production and injection molding.
To mitigate the environmental impact of plastics in the automotive sector, automakers can focus on bioplastics, renewable materials, energy efficiency, and recycling within a circular economy model.
Reducing the carbon footprint in car manufacturing involves implementing various optimization strategies aimed at minimizing emissions and enhancing energy efficiency throughout the production process:
Find out more about carbon reduction measures and targets in the automotive industry compared to other sectors.
While GHG emissions and the Product Carbon Footprint are significant aspects of the total environmental impacts, a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of car manufacturing must consider a broader range of factors. Other hazardous effects such as air pollution, resource depletion, land use, and water consumption play crucial roles in assessing the environmental performance of the manufacturing processes of cars.
By considering these other effects, car manufacturers can make more informed decisions about reducing their environmental footprint and conserving natural resources, contributing to holistic environmental stewardship.
In addition to creating more climate-friendly production processes, sustainable design and engineering can help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions:
Here, the use of recycled and recyclable materials is key. In addition, advances in aerodynamics and lightweight construction techniques are contributing to improved fuel efficiency and lower emissions during vehicle operation. But also the integration of electric and hybrid propulsion systems further reduces reliance on fossil fuels, leading to lower carbon emissions over the vehicle's lifecycle.
When conducting PCFs in car manufacturing, it is crucial to collect primary data at hotspots to ensure informed decision making. As a result, OEMs are increasingly requiring their suppliers to provide precise data on the global warming potential (GWP) of materials and components delivered.
This is where the International Material Data System (IMDS) and appropriate software solutions come into play. IMDS is a centralized database used by the automotive industry to manage and exchange material data for compliance and reporting purposes. Its robust data management capabilities make it a trusted source for obtaining comprehensive data for environmental assessments.
Recognizing the significance of sustainability in the automotive industry, IMDS is expanding its functionality to include PCF information alongside material data. This enhancement enables stakeholders to access GWP data directly within the IMDS system.
Benefit from a machine learning-based mapping of your production data with GWP data and a connection of material information from IMDS and BOMs.
Our Software iPoint Product Sustainability Automotive offer advanced capabilities for integrating environmental data throughout the product lifecycle: streamlining the environmental assessment process while ensuring data accuracy and consistency at the same time.
Contact our sustainability experts for the automotive industry to gain more insight into how your greenhouse gas emissions can be reduced in the long term.