Getting it Straight: Exact Carbon Emissions From One Bottle of Wine

Getting it Straight: Exact Carbon Emissions From One Bottle of Wine

I bet you know how much carbon dioxide your car emits per kilometer. Maybe you are also well informed about the carbon reduction goals of the country where you live. But, when the working day is over, when you sit in a restaurant or relax at home with your partner or a friend by your side, deep in good conversation, when you start to enjoy life and when you open a delicious bottle of Spanish red wine – have you ever thought about its impact on the climate and its Carbon Footprint?

Carbon Footprint of a bottle of wine

Grupo ARCE has. The company derives its expertise from having calculated carbon footprints in the food sector and the electromechanical industry. Operating in Spain, a country which scores third when it comes to global red wine production, grupo ARCE can have a word to say concerning the environmental impact of wine.

PAS 2050 used to analyzed the carbon footprint

Following the PAS 2050 methodology, they analyzed the carbon footprint of a single bottle of wine. Not any wine, but a Verdejo from Rueda, to be precise. “Verdejo wines are aromatic, often soft and full-bodied,” reads Wikipedia. Are they also environmentally friendly?

This is where the analysis becomes interesting. Reducing climate impacts, no matter whether it concerns a car’s impact or a wine’s impact, requires a certain knowledge of how the product is made. This knowledge, together with convenient climate assessment software, makes for a detailed analysis of which parts of the product contribute the most, and of where the reduction potential is highest.

Part of the Process Map: Raw Materials and Manufacture in Umberto for Carbon Footprint (c) grupo arce


Here you can see what it might look like: the first two steps of a process map. The process map is essential for a precise carbon assessment. The complete maps for both the red and the white wines that grupo ARCE analyzed are available online. They can be found at umberto’s download section (after a free registration), via “Umberto User Workshop 2011”, where the presentation was given.

Raw material production phase emits the most carbon emissions

From the first result, we can see that the raw material production phase emits the most. Raw materials account for 0.80 out of 1.28kg CO2-equivalent emissions. Remember: the functional unit analyzed here is one bottle and the approach is cradle to grave. That means we consider the full life cycle of a bottle of wine, from grape growing to wine making to drinking to throwing away the bottle.

Out of 1.21 kg CO2-eq emissions per bottle of wine, 0.8 kg derive from the raw materials (c) grupo ARCE


Product Carbon Footprint of Wine: It’s not transport – it’s packaging

Interestingly, the biggest slice of the wine’s impact is not its transport. It is the packaging, as you can see in the following image. By the way: the distribution/retail phase is based on an overall distance of approximately 2200 km. The grape production, or shall we say the wine making process’s most essential part, contributes only 32%, whereas the most influential carbon emission comes from the packaging. Almost half of the total product carbon footprint – 46%! – derives from the packaging, visible in the following image.


Which material exactly? The packaging parts consist, among others, of 4% for the cork, and of 85% for the glass.

Emission share of all the packaging materials (c) grupo ARCE

Wow! Summing it up, the carbon footprint of a bottle of wine, which equals 1,2144 kg of carbon dioxide, includes a 39% contribution from the glass bottle alone!

39% of the emissions a bottle of wine generates, are caused by the glass bottle (c) grupo ARCE

If you want to get into detail with this, consider registering at the umberto website and navigate to the download section, where many presentations from the umberto user workshops can be accessed. The following two “know the flow” articles may also be of interest to you:

The amazing article image was taken by gfpeck and yes, it is turned 90 degrees. No, the author was not under the influence of a Verdejo while writing this article.


Add comment

You may also like